“小学生研究癌症论文”一等奖、三等奖均被撤销!
近日,云南省昆明市一名六年级小学生以“C10orf67在结直肠癌发生发展中的功能与机制研究”项目,获得第34届云南省青少年科技创新大赛一等奖、第34届全国青少年科技创新大赛三等奖,引发社会关注。
16日,全国青少年科技创新大赛发布最新通报,决定撤销该项目第34届全国青少年科技创新大赛三等奖,收回奖牌和证书。
The father of a primary school student who won third prize at a national science contest last year for work on colorectal cancer has acknowledged and apologized for his “over-involvement” in his child’s project, he said in a statement on ScienceNet.cn on Wednesday.The winning project focuses on the function of the C10orf67 gene in the development of colorectal cancer. It received third prize at the 34th China Adolescents Science and Technology Innovation Contest (CASTIC) and first prize at the 34th Yunnan Province Adolescents Science and Technology Innovative Project Contest.On the same day, an official announcement from the office of CASTIC's organizing committee declared the prize canceled, recalling the medal and certificate awarded to the sixth-grader.According to professionals on CASTIC’s investigative team, the project violated its independent work requirement. A comprehensive review of the project found it of a professionalism outside of the cognitive level and writing ability of a sixth-grader, making it impossible that the winning research paper was produced independently.
记者查阅全国青少年科技创新大赛历年获奖名单发现,类似的“高大上”中小学生研究项目不在少数。
项目简介附有两张图片,一张为整齐排列的20多只小鼠实验体,另一张为不同状态下的不同体积的小鼠肿瘤。
A third-grade student and a fifth-grade student in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei province won third prize in a national level contest with their co-research work on an anti-tumor experimental study involving polyphenol from tea.One photo featuring more than 20 mice in neat rows and another featuring mice tumors of different sizes were shown on the website.According to the contest website, the experimental results showed that "green tea extract EGCG has a certain anti-tumor effect."
“小鼠成果没有几年不可能完成。”昆明市某研究所的一位科研人员告诉记者。
“比赛已经变味儿了。”在中科院昆明某下属研究所工作的研究人员黄某告诉记者,之前有朋友请他帮助孩子参加这项大赛,他帮孩子设计了一个符合其知识能力水平的项目,没想到班主任看过后却连说“太low了”。
云南省建水县一名连续多年带领学生参赛的崔老师告诉记者,每年获奖名单出炉后,他都会感叹一些获奖作品的水平之高。“比如有小学生研究十分复杂的导航系统,如果没有专业人员的大力介入,我相信是无法完成的。”
记者查阅大赛评审规则发现,评审规则强调必须由参赛者自己选题、自己设计和研究、自己制作和撰写,并明确要求设计中的创造性贡献必须是参赛者本人构思、完成。
为了防止造假,大赛不仅要求参赛学生做项目时要拍照留痕、留存资料,还在各级比赛中设置了答辩环节。“答辩是在一个封闭场地内进行的,除了专家和参赛学生,其他人不准进入。”崔某说。
记者调查发现,云南省科协邀请的评审专家大多是各高等院校、科研院所的资深教授、研究员。云南省一名科研人员告诉记者,从评审专家的专业背景、资历来看,要甄别出参赛者是否作假、是独立研究还是借他人力量,应该非常简单。
对于评审专家为何没能发现一些参赛作品明显超出了中小学生知识能力范围,赛事组织方没有正面回答,仅称“我们也提倡高校院所对青少年进行支持,大手拉小手,会对青少年有所启发”。
来源:新华社 环球时报 南方都市报 Shine
推 荐 阅 读
关键词
青少年科技创新大赛
全国青少年科技创新大赛
机制
孩子
功能
最新评论
推荐文章
作者最新文章
你可能感兴趣的文章
Copyright Disclaimer: The copyright of contents (including texts, images, videos and audios) posted above belong to the User who shared or the third-party website which the User shared from. If you found your copyright have been infringed, please send a DMCA takedown notice to [email protected]. For more detail of the source, please click on the button "Read Original Post" below. For other communications, please send to [email protected].
版权声明:以上内容为用户推荐收藏至CareerEngine平台,其内容(含文字、图片、视频、音频等)及知识版权均属用户或用户转发自的第三方网站,如涉嫌侵权,请通知[email protected]进行信息删除。如需查看信息来源,请点击“查看原文”。如需洽谈其它事宜,请联系[email protected]。
版权声明:以上内容为用户推荐收藏至CareerEngine平台,其内容(含文字、图片、视频、音频等)及知识版权均属用户或用户转发自的第三方网站,如涉嫌侵权,请通知[email protected]进行信息删除。如需查看信息来源,请点击“查看原文”。如需洽谈其它事宜,请联系[email protected]。