为什么说拜登是民主党2020击败川普的最佳人选？

原标题：

A vote for Joe Biden is a vote for political normalcy and calm. 

Joe Biden wasn’t supposed to win as big as he did on Super Tuesday. The former vice president finished a disappointing fourth in the Iowa Caucuses and an even weaker fifth place in New Hampshire. Just a few weeks ago, Biden’s campaign aides were brainstorming how he could bow out of the race with some shred of dignity. Perhaps a close first or second place finish in South Carolina, and, if Super Tuesday went as poorly as it was projected to, they would put a quiet end to his bid for presidency. Mr. Biden was being outspent and outmaneuvered, and struggling in the polls. And yet, name recognition as the party’s most popular sidekick, relationships with crucial Democratic heavyweights (like Representative Clyburn of South Carolina), and centrist policy positions to win over moderates propelled him to a much-needed victory in South Carolina, and one week later, and huge wins on Super Tuesday. 

In wake of the results of Super Tuesday, Joe Biden is the candidate best equipped to defeat Donald Trump in the presidential election. 

Frankly, Joe Biden is one of the least impressive candidates to grace the 2020 campaign trail. In comparison to Elizabeth Warren’s mastery of policy, Bernie Sanders’ ability to cultivate grassroots enthusiasm, and Pete Buttigieg’s sleek resume, Biden seems like an outdated fragment of the Democratic Party’s past. His weak fundraising, feeble campaign organization, and continuous blunders throughout the Democratic debates seemed to suggest that Biden was slowly digging his own political grave. Nonetheless, voters seem to agree that Biden is still the safest nominee to challenge Donald Trump. 

Super Tuesday exit polls seemed to suggest that Biden has the greatest capacity of all the candidates to pick up the largest demographic range of voters. In Virginia, Biden dominated across all demographic lines, including race, gender, and age. Biden won support from men, women, whites, and African Americans, college graduates, and non-college graduates alike, by significant margins over Bernie Sanders. In several of the demographic categories, Biden won a share of the vote greater than Sanders’ and Warren’s votes combined. Biden even made major inroads with other crucial Democratic constituents, including Latinos, which he won by a margin of 13% in Virginia. Biden accomplished this spending minimal amounts of money ($2.2 million vs Bernie Sanders’ $18 million and Michael Bloomberg’s $234 million) on Super Tuesday ads. 

The only demographic that Sanders won in Virginia was younger voters. But even this triumph raises alarms about Sanders’ viability in the general election. 

Mr. Sanders often points to the fact that polls have him beating Donald Trump by the largest margin, in comparison to other Democratic candidates. This is true, but a new political science study conducted by David Broockman of UC Berkeley and Joshua Kalla of Yale shines some light onto this claim. In a survey of 40,000 possible voters, Sanders loses swing voters to Trump by a large margin. He ultimately makes up for this through support from young voters, particularly support from “Bernie or Bust” voters, those who say they will not vote if Bernie is not the chosen nominee. 

While the prevalence of young “Bernie or Bust” voters may seem to make a case for Bernie’s candidacy, relying on young electorate turnout is a dangerous game. Choosing Sanders as the nominee would mean trading some of the electorate’s most reliable voters (ages 50+) for some of the least. Broockman and Kalla have calculated that Sanders would need a surge in youth turnout by almost 11%. For reference, Barack Obama was only able to raise black voter turnout by 5%. Furthermore, Broockman asserts that opposing party turnout tends to swell the farther left or right the rival party candidate is – bad news for Sanders, who already struggles with swing voters. That’s not to say that Sanders is necessarily a bad candidate. It merely suggests that Sanders’ polling numbers are not as optimistic as they seem. 2020 is not the year to take such a dramatic risk. Why should Democrats bet their chances on a “youth wave” that has historically never materialized? 

Biden has shown that he can win over the electorate with minimal amounts of funding. His name recognition and connections with Democratic Party leaders alone may be enough to make up for his less than stellar performances on the debate stage and at campaign rallies. Still, in the eyes of the voters, the strongest argument for Biden’s viability as a candidate has nothing to do with poll numbers, fundraising, or even policy. It’s true - a vote for Biden passes up on a chance to pass radical and systematic change. But perhaps voters aren’t ready for something like that quite yet. A vote for Biden is a vote for another four years of the Democratic establishment, but also the possibility for a calmer presidency. Divisive politics is exhausting for the average citizen. The average American doesn’t want to be bombarded by daily headlines of contentious Supreme Court nominations, looming threats of impeachment, and nasty social media spats. A Biden presidency may be just what the nation needs, where politics fades into the background for most, and the nation gets some much-needed time to heal. A vote for Joe Biden is a vote to bring decency and humanity back into the white house.