图文来源网络，欢迎原作者联系我们
不代表本平台观点和立场，请读者选择阅读
过往热文推荐：穆斯卡撕毁古兰经事件立刻成为各大新闻头条
安省已然从富有的省份，慢慢走向中产阶级都很难生存的省。
看下图吧。经过15年的自由党腐败经营，安省已经政府臃肿，债台高筑，我们还要忍受下去吗？
原因就不一一解释了，大家多少都知道一些。
然而没有最奇葩，只有更奇葩。
我们的省长大人，竟然邀请了一个性犯罪的犯罪份子来帮我们安省的家长们编写新教育大纲。
群友表示：“有孩子的家长一定要知道：现任自由党省长 Wynne 指派因性侵和传播儿童黄色照片已被定罪了的 Ben Levin 撰写通过了新性教育大纲，从小学一年级开始教孩子性知识，进而鼓励孩子们很早尝试手淫，甚至鼓吹同性恋，各种......我都写不下去啦！”
安省进步保守党领袖 Doug Ford 要重新审视这个性教育大纲，他认为孩子们的第一教师是父母，对孩子的性教育要在父母认可的范围内进行。后面我们要认真给大家介绍父母才是孩子的第一教育者机构PAFE
下图调查表明80%的安省居民反对省长的教育大纲

下图：还记得照片中的人吗，本杰明
他被韦恩省长选中去编写性教育课程
然而他其实是个被定罪性侵的罪犯
真是是可忍孰不可忍！
与此对立的，则是一个叫：父母才是孩子的第一教育者机构
平台君相信大部分华人家长，都支持这一观点的。
如果能把这个男人换掉，改一个更加靠谱的爱心妈妈，来给我们的孩子编撰教育大纲，你们会更欢迎谁？
下面，一起来了解一下PAFE写给支持者的一封信，通过这些，来看看他们的态度和工作内容。希望家长们一起来支持PAFE(家长作为第一教育者）密西沙加目前的参选者之一谭雅，就是这个机构的FOUNDER，她最近在密西沙加参选MMP，希望当地的家长们能支持她。
文章来源“父母才是孩子的第一教育者”机构
Dr. Teresa Pierre, PAFE’s founder, is stepping in as interim President.
作为家长，我们必须警惕我们的孩子在上网时不能接触成人内容，无论是在家里，在朋友，甚至在学校。但是如果你的孩子的老师故意把它引入教室怎么办？
我（Teresa Pierre博士）参加了一个小组讨论CBC广播，是从前，Kristen Gilbert的性工作者当前的最后一周，Matthew Johnson和媒体的智慧，一个总部设在渥太华的非盈利集团专注于数字媒体素养。
在这个面板上的整个的经历使我再次对PAFE（注：父母才是第一教育者的简称）说了什么一直以来关于综合性的教育，如安大略的性教育课程的支持者：他们始终无法保障儿童提供太多的性潜伏期时间的天真。
在这种情况下，他们冒着将孩子推向可能使他们陷入上瘾的毁灭性世界的经历的危险。吉尔伯特和约翰逊都是性教育的支持者。职业性教育工作者吉尔伯特对课堂上讨论色情内容毫无异议。
这就是为什么支持政治候选人如在即将到来的六月选举Tanya Granic Allen如此重要。谭雅知道，尊重儿童发展的基准是很重要的，没有提供更多的信息比孩子能合理处理和将争取废除安大略的性教育课程。
吉尔伯特说，她欢迎在课堂上讨论色情作品，尽管她说她受法律约束，她在什么年龄可以讨论某些话题（这是从最后的广播节目中忽略的事实）。当问到她希望在教室里看到色情作品时，她说：
每当课堂上随机地出现。但我绝对希望你知道，8年级的人有很多关于这个他们可以使用的信息。
她对色情的看法是什么？提出了一个刻薄的妇女观？色情作品与年轻人冒险性行为有关吗？当与手淫结合时，它被证明有助于勃起功能障碍的年轻男性中更高的比率。
它使男人无法在一段关系中分享共同决策？
不，吉尔伯特的观点是：
我不知道的想法，年轻人可能手淫必然会下跌。作为一名教育工作者，这不是我的目标。我的目标是给人们提供信息，使他们能够根据自己的个人价值做出决定。
我（Teresa Pierre博士）对此的反应是：
我不会接受那种观点。我相信我以前提到过的这个问题确实是这种行为的成瘾性，我认为你不想在这么小的时候就让孩子接触，因为这会对他们形成实际附件的能力产生重大的负面影响。
吉尔伯特没有具体说明她想要什么类型的信息，但她没有一次建议对年轻人是否应该使用什么类型的色情片设置任何限制。
这是成瘾的标志的大脑的变化已被证明发生者如剑桥神经精神病学家色情强迫观众中，Valerie Voon博士：
在一份发表在《公共科学图书馆》杂志上的研究报告中，一篇2014年度同行评议的期刊（以及一部关于大脑的纪录片色情片）已经表明，那些描述自己沉迷于色情的人（以及因色情而失去关系的人）在同一个大脑区域——奖励中心——也像吸毒者一样发生了变化。3。
色情作品不列在正式的成瘾名单中，但许多色情色情领域的专家认为应该这样做。2016岁的Simone Kuhn认为应该正式宣布上瘾。
该小组的第三名成员，Matthew Johnson，来自一个专注于数字和媒体素养的小组，对7到11年级学生的色情使用情况进行了调查。他的调查结果表明，男孩比女孩更多地故意寻找色情作品。那些正在寻找的男孩们经常这样做。所以28%的男孩每天至少看一次色情片，或者每周至少看一次。所以对于那些正在做这件事的人来说，这显然是他们的习惯。
他对男孩的观察习惯的经验支持了我的观点，即看色情片会很快上瘾。
在采访中，我认为一般性的讨论色情在学校可能是好的，但它不应该发生在青少年时期，应该包含一个关于色情的危害的有力讨论。
如果你也反对孩子色情暴露在课堂在年轻的年龄，重要的是支持的候选人如Tanya Granic Allen谁在PC党的领导和提出这些问题。
帮助PAFE继续工作
帮助我们争取父母的权利！
《加拿大父母作为第一教育家》作者：Teresa Pierre博士
如果把前面那个恐怖男人，换成这个贴心的妈妈来给我们的孩子们写教育大纲，大家觉得谁更受欢迎？
原文：
As parents, we have to be vigilant that our children don’t access adult content when they are surfing the internet, whether at home, at a friend’s or even at school.  But what if your child’s teacher were to deliberately introduce it into the classroom?

I participated in a panel discussion for CBC’s Radio’s The Current last week with a sex educator from BC, Kristen Gilbert, and Matthew Johnson of Media Smarts, an Ottawa based non-profit group focused on digital and media literacy.  Find the podcast here.
The whole experience of being on this panel convinced me all over again about what PAFE has said all along about proponents of comprehensive sex education such as Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum:  they consistently fail to safeguard the innocence of children and the time of sexual latency by offering too much too soon.  In this case, they run the risk of propelling children toward experiences that may well sweep them up into the destructive world of addiction.  Both Gilbert and Johnson were comprehensive sex-ed supporters.  Gilbert, the professional sex educator, had absolutely nothing negative to say about discussing porn in the classroom.  
This is why it’s so important to support political candidates such as Tanya Granic Allen in the upcoming June election.  Tanya knows that it’s important to respect the benchmarks of child development and not to offer more information than children can reasonably handle and will fight to repeal Ontario’s sex-ed curriculum.
Gilbert said she welcomes discussions of porn whenever they come up in the classroom, although she qualified this by saying she is constrained by law about at what ages she can discuss certain topics (a fact that was omitted from the final radio program).  Asked at what age she would like to see porn addressed in the classroom, she said:
“Whenever it comes up organically in class. But I'm definitely hoping that you know certainly by Grade 8 people have a lot of information about this that they can use.”
And what would her message about porn be?  That it presents a demeaning view of women?  That pornography has been connected to the adoption of risky sexual behavior by young people?  That when coupled with masturbation it’s been demonstrated to contribute to higher rates among young men of erectile dysfunction?1 That it renders men incapable of sharing mutual decision-making within a relationship?2 
No, Gilbert’s point was:
I don't see the idea that young people might be masturbating as necessarily a downside. That's not my goal as an educator to discourage that. My goal is to give people information so that they can make decisions that work with their personal values.
My response to that was:
I wouldn't take that view. I believe that the issue as I've alluded to before is really the addictive quality of this behaviour and I think that you don't want to expose kids to this at such a young age because it can have significant negative effects on their ability to form actual attachments.
Gilbert did not specify what types of information she had in mind, but not once did she suggest placing any sort of limitations on whether or what type of porn young people should be consuming.
The brain changes that are a hallmark of addiction have been demonstrated to take place among compulsive viewers of pornography by researchers such as Cambridge neuropsychiatrist, Dr. Valerie Voon:
In a study published in PLOS ONE, a peer-reviewed journal in 2014 (and the subject of a documentary Porn on the Brain) has shown that men who describe themselves as addicted to porn (and who lost relationships because of it) develop changes in the same brain area - the reward centre - as do drug addicts.3
Pornography is not listed in official lists of addiction, but many specialists in the area of compulsive pornography viewing, think it should be. Simone Kuhn, argued in 2016 it should be officially declared an addiction.4
The third member of the panel, Matthew Johnson, from a group focused on digital and media literacy, conducted a survey on porn use among students in grades 7 through 11.  His survey results showed that many more boys than girls seek out pornography intentionally. And those boys who were seeking it out were doing so often. So 28 per cent of the boys had looked for pornography at least once a day or at least once a week. So for those who were doing it, it was clearly a habit for them. 
His experience with the viewing habits of boys supports my view that pornography viewing can rapidly become addictive. 
In the interview I argue that a general discussion of pornography in schools might be ok, but it should not take place before the mid-teens, and should contain a robust discussion of the harms of pornography. 
If you too are opposed to exposing kids to porn in the classroom at young ages, it's important to support candidates such as Tanya Granic Allen who ran in the PC Party leadership race and brought these issues forward. To help PAFE continue its work, please make a contribution today by clicking here.
For the family,
Teresa Pierre
--我是一个安安静静的广告位--
延伸阅读：夏令时即将到来。希望加拿大的“隆冬”也能随之而去
家长们，一起来谈谈你们的看法吧
历史延伸阅读三月春风似剪刀，这股凌厉的风暴即将横扫全国！全国反土豆组织的爱国者游行活动
想获得更大的权利吗？请先想办法拥有权力！
继续阅读
阅读原文