他预测特朗普2016年当总统!也曾9次准确预测美国总统,这位历史学教授2020年预测会成真吗?(附视频&解说稿)
点击上方“精彩英语演讲”,选择“设为星标”
英语演讲视频,第一时间观看
自1984年以来,美国历史学教授 Allan Lichtman 已连续9次准确预测美国总统选举结果,包括2016年曾预言特朗普将击败希拉里。
特朗普(Donald Trump)击败希拉里(Hillary Clinton),当选美国第45任总统,令不少人大跌眼镜。不过,对于美利坚大学(American University)政治历史学教授 Allan Lichtman 来说,结果不出他所料;从1984年起,Lichtman 已经连续9次准确预测总统大选结果,包括预言特朗普会胜出2016年总统选举。
Lichtman 的预测方法和传统的不同。民调、人口结构变化,以至他本人的政治理念,都不是他的判断基础。在仔细研究了从1860年至1980年间每一次的美国总统选举后,他提炼出13个陈述句,只要对应现实逐一回答”是”或”非”,就能预测执政党和在野党候选人之间谁胜谁负。
1988年,Lichtman 首次出版《成为总统的13个关键》(Thirteen Keys to the Presidency)一书,阐释其观察、分析和预测方法,此系列书籍后来更如同大选”年鉴”般一版再版。
近日,《纽约时报》连线Allan Lichtman,对2020年美国总统结果进行了分析,他认为特朗普会落选。一起来看看视频里他是怎么说的?
This is professor Allan Lichtman. He's taught history at American University
for almost 50 years. He's a former steeplechase champion. "It's a race designed
for horses but run by people." "Tic-Tac-Dough." And a former quiz show winner.
"I had a 16-show winning streak. Won four cars." But we're not here to talk
about any of that.
We're here because "Allan Lichtman" "Allan Lichtman" "Allan
Lichtman" is the Nostradamus of presidential elections. He's accurately
predicted them for four decades. Yes, even that one. "Donald Trump sent me a
note. Congrats professor. Good call. In his big Sharpie letters."
Now Allan's
ready to tell us who will win in 2020. But we'll come back to that. Allan
Lichtman is certain we've been thinking about elections all wrong. "The
pollsters and the pundits cover elections as though they were horse races. But
history tells us voters are not fooled by the tricks of the campaign. Voters
vote pragmatically according to how well the party holding the White House has
governed the country."
So polls are worthless? "They are snapshots in time. None
of this in the end has any impact whatsoever on the outcome of a presidential
election." So Allan Lichtman designed a better system to predict presidential
winners. He calls it "The Keys to the White House." And like some other politics
these days, there's a Russian involved. "
In 1981, I met Vladimir Keilis-Borok.
Vladimir turned to me and said, we are going to collaborate." By the way,
Vladimir wasn't a historian or a politician. He was a leading expert in
predicting earthquakes. "This point, I thought the guy was either nuts or KGB."
He wasn't. "We recast American presidential elections as stability, the party
holding the White House keeps the White House. And earthquake, the White House
party is turned out of power." So they got to work. "We looked at every
presidential election from 1860 to 1980." What they found were 13 keys. Only two
of which have anything to do with the traits of the candidates.
Allan has used
the keys to accurately predict every election. First in 1984, calling it two
years early before anyone even knew who Reagan's contender would be. In 1988,
calling it in spring when Bush was trailing Dukakis. Again in '92, '96 and in
2000, when he called it for Al Gore? Hey, Allan. "No, no, I wasn't wrong. I
correctly predicted that Al Gore would win the popular vote.
When I first
developed the system in '81, you had to go all the way back to 1888 to find a
divergence between the popular vote and the Electoral College vote." So Allan
eventually started calling the winner, not just the popular vote, which was
useful 16 years later when, well, you know. "I'm a Democrat. And the toughest
thing in being a forecaster is to keep your own politics out of it." But that's
enough history, professor.
Let's get to it. What do Allan's 13 keys predict for
2020? "And remember, an answer of 'true' always favors the re-election of the
White House party. If six or more of the keys are false, you get a political
earthquake."
OK, No. 1: The White House party gained House seats between midterm
elections. "Republicans lost the U.S. House midterms in 2018. So false."
No. 2:
There is no primary contest for the White House party. "No Republicans
challenged Trump for his renomination. So true."
No. 3: The incumbent seeking.
The sitting president is running for re-election. "Doesn't look like he's
stepping down, so true."
Four: There is no third-party challenger. "Despite
claims by Kanye West to be running, this is a two-party race." This is looking
pretty good for Trump so far.
No. 5: The short-term economy is strong. "The
pandemic has pushed the economy into recession. False."
Six: Long-term economic
growth during this presidential term has been as good as the past two terms.
"The pandemic has caused such negative G.D.P. growth in 2020 that the key has
turned false."
No. 7: The White House has made major changes to national policy.
"Through his big tax cut, but mostly through his executive orders, Trump has
fundamentally changed the policies of the Obama era. So true."
No. 8: There is
no social unrest during the term. "There has been considerable social unrest on
the streets, with enough violence to threaten the social order. So false."
No.
9: The White House is untainted by scandal. "My favorite key. As I predicted,
Trump was impeached. Plus he has plenty of other scandals. So false."
No. 10:
The White House has no major foreign or military failures abroad. "We've had
some very difficult moments with Donald Trump. But so far, true."
11: The White
House has a major success abroad. "While Trump hasn't had any big splashy
failures, he hasn't had any major successes either. So false."
12: The
incumbent-party candidate is charismatic. "Donald Trump is a great showman. But
he only appeals to a narrow slice of the American people. And as a result,
false."
13: The challenger is uncharismatic. "Biden is a decent empathetic
person, but he's not inspirational or charismatic. So true." That means — "The
keys predict that Trump will lose the White House." That's Allan Lichtman's
prediction. And Allan Lichtman is always right.
"Don't just take my word for it.
There are forces at play outside the keys — voter suppression, Russian meddling.
It's up to you the voters to decide the future of our democracy. So get out and
vote. Vote in person. Vote by mail. As Abraham Lincoln said, the best way to
predict the future is to choose it."
在2016年版本的《预测下一任总统:入主白宫的关键》(Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House)中,Lichtman 再一次罗列了这13个陈述句,由此预测希拉里还是特朗普将入主白宫:
政党授权(Party Mandate)
竞争(Contest)
执政(Incumbency)
第三政党(Third party)
短期经济(Short-term economy)
长期经济(Long-term economy)
政策改革(Policy change)
社会动荡(Social unrest)
丑闻(Scandal)
外交/军事失败(Foreign/military failure)
外交/军事胜利(Foreign/military success)
当政者的个人魅力(Incumbent charisma)
挑战者的个人魅力(Challenger charisma)
Lichtman 表示,他的理论基础在于,选举主要视乎民众对执政党表现的满意程度。换句话说,在以上13个陈述句中,答案为”是”代表有利执政党,相反,若出现6个或以上的答案为”非”,反对党候选人就会赢得选举。Lichtman根据本届情况,对1、3、4、7、11及12共6个陈述句给出了”非”的答案,因而预测特朗普将胜选,结果也真的如他所料。
尽管又一次料事如神,但其实在大选结果揭盅前,Lichtman 也曾担心自己的长胜纪录将毁于特朗普手上。Lichtman 坦言,自他1984年首次预测总统选举结果以来,本届是最难预测的一届,因为自1860年林肯(Abraham Lincoln)当选美国总统以来,”从来没有出现过像特朗普这样的总统候选人”。
我们从未见过一个候选人,穷毕生精力从他人身上巧取豪夺。他也是第一个在竞选期间不断撤谎的候选人;第一个会引入敌对外国势力,到美国选举中搞局的候选人;第一个将一名满手鲜血的敌对外国独裁者视为榜样的候选人。综观所有例外,特朗普有可能在现实情况及历史案例都对他有利的情况下败选,打破150多年来的规律。
其实除了 Lichtman 教授,还有不少人预测特朗普会当选。今年9月,英国脱欧运动的领军人物之一、英国独立党(UKIP)前党魁法拉杰(Nigel Farage)(编注:法拉杰今年7月辞任 UKIP 党魁,但于今年10月出任该党临时党魁)接受路透社访问时表示:”我强烈认为特朗普会赢得大选。”他分析指,英国公投结果会让特朗普获得更多的支持,那股在全球范围内涌起的民粹主义力量,能推动脱欧派胜出英国公投,也一样能推动共和党赢得美国大选。
最新评论
推荐文章
作者最新文章
你可能感兴趣的文章
Copyright Disclaimer: The copyright of contents (including texts, images, videos and audios) posted above belong to the User who shared or the third-party website which the User shared from. If you found your copyright have been infringed, please send a DMCA takedown notice to [email protected]. For more detail of the source, please click on the button "Read Original Post" below. For other communications, please send to [email protected].
版权声明:以上内容为用户推荐收藏至CareerEngine平台,其内容(含文字、图片、视频、音频等)及知识版权均属用户或用户转发自的第三方网站,如涉嫌侵权,请通知[email protected]进行信息删除。如需查看信息来源,请点击“查看原文”。如需洽谈其它事宜,请联系[email protected]。
版权声明:以上内容为用户推荐收藏至CareerEngine平台,其内容(含文字、图片、视频、音频等)及知识版权均属用户或用户转发自的第三方网站,如涉嫌侵权,请通知[email protected]进行信息删除。如需查看信息来源,请点击“查看原文”。如需洽谈其它事宜,请联系[email protected]。